United StatesArizona › Salt River Project vs Trico Electric Cooperative

EnergySavings · Arizona · Comparison

Salt River Project vs Trico Electric Cooperative Inc: who pays less in Arizona?

Data as of: EIA-861 annual 2024 (released 2025) · EIA monthly state prices February 2026 · EIA weekly heating-fuel survey Mar 30, 2026 · retail-choice registry reviewed Jun 2026 · URDB tariffs pulled Jun 2026. Page generated 2026-06-12.

Salt River Project customers paid less: an average 13.46¢/kWh in 2024 versus 14.17¢/kWh at Trico Electric Cooperative Inc (EIA-861) — a gap of 0.71¢/kWh, worth about $77 per year at typical usage (10,800 kWh/yr). Their territories meet in 1 AZ county (Pinal). You cannot switch wires companies — the territory is set by your address.

Side by side (AZ, EIA-861)

Salt River Project vs Trico Electric Cooperative Inc — residential averages from federal EIA-861 filings
MetricSalt River ProjectTrico Electric Cooperative Inc
2024 average price, ¢/kWh13.4614.17
2023 average price, ¢/kWh12.4714.22
Annual cost at 10,800 kWh, $/yr$1,453$1,530
Residential customers (2024)1,053,40752,450
OwnershipPublic districtCo-op
Counties served in AZ33

Average price = residential revenue ÷ sales (bundled service): the all-in price customers actually paid, including supply, delivery and riders. Profiles: Salt River Project · Trico Electric Cooperative Inc · Arizona overview.

Where the territories meet

Both utilities file EIA-861 service territory in: Pinal county (AZ, 2024).

Adjoining or overlapping territory in a county does not mean households there can pick between the two — service maps are parcel-level and fixed. The county overlap mainly matters when choosing where to live or comparing town-level costs.

Can you actually choose between them?

No — not for delivery. Distribution territories are exclusive and set by address; Salt River Project and Trico Electric Cooperative Inc do not compete for the same meters. Arizona is a regulated retail market — there is no residential supplier shopping; rates are set in utility-commission proceedings (azcc.gov). The price gap above mainly matters when choosing where to live, comparing towns, or benchmarking your bill.

Questions people ask

Is Salt River Project cheaper than Trico Electric Cooperative Inc?
Yes — in 2024 Salt River Project customers averaged 13.46 cents/kWh versus 14.17 for Trico Electric Cooperative Inc (EIA-861). Salt River Project was cheaper by 0.71 cents, about $77 per year at 10,800 kWh.
Can I switch from Trico Electric Cooperative Inc to Salt River Project?
No — distribution territories are exclusive and set by address; you cannot pick between the two wires companies. Arizona has no residential supplier shopping either; rates are set in utility-commission proceedings.
Why is Trico Electric Cooperative Inc more expensive than Salt River Project?
EIA-861 averages reflect everything customers actually paid — supply costs, delivery rates, riders, and surcharges across each territory. Differences in generation mix, grid investment, storm costs, and customer density between Trico Electric Cooperative and Salt River Project territory all feed the 0.71-cent gap.
About these numbers. Rates shown are averages computed from federal regulatory filings (EIA Form 861) and public tariff databases — confirm with your utility before making decisions; your actual rate depends on your tariff, usage, and riders. Distribution utility is determined by address and generally cannot be chosen; in retail-choice states you may choose your supplier for the supply portion of the bill. Savings figures use 10,800 kWh/yr (US average residential usage) and are estimates, not quotes. EnergySavings is an independent data project by CertiHomes and is not affiliated with any utility, supplier, or government agency.